- Little Help From Our Friends? - September 2, 2026
- A quick yawp from Mr. History - August 24, 2026
- First Thoughts on “The Beatles – A Four-Film Cinematic Event” - August 17, 2026

A 1985 bootleg containing the mysterious track “Peace of Mind.”
I don’t know what fans think of boots anymore. For me they caused a genuine kind of ecstasy, but I don’t know if the thrill of them is possible these nowdays, with every track available via YouTube. I can only report that for a fan who came to maturity in the bleak years after Lennon’s death–when we knew there would be no reunion, for the most awful reason possible–bootlegs were as close I’d ever come to what it must’ve felt like during the Sixties. “NEW ALBUM OUT NOW.”
My beloved Aunt, our family’s Patient Zero for Beatlemania and the person who introduced me to the group at five (though in 1974 no introduction was necessary; they were still omnipresent), never understood my fascination with boots. “It’s like the real song, only worse,” I remember her saying as I played a vinyl LP (NEMS’ Strawberry Fields Forever) I’d just picked up at Vintage Vinyl. I’m happy to report that VV is still in business by the way, squatting proudly on St. Louis’ Delmar Loop like a proud hippie; I just went there with my Uncle, and yes, I did look for bootlegs.
During high school boots were a mania, and I’d trek nearly every weekend into Chicago looking for them, because my local shop (Val’s Halla underneath the El tracks) was too sensible to stock them. I’d walk into Wax Trax on Ashland or Gramophone on Clybourn (also still there!) looking for Beatles boots but would more often come out with some new UK import instead, The Smiths or The The or XTC, any one of a million great English bands that scratched that Beatles itch just a tiny bit. But of course a new boot was the best outcome of all.
When I think of my mania now, I always remember that for me it wasn’t simply the secret aspect, though it was cool indeed to know a Beatles song your friends had never heard. Nor was it just about collecting, though anyone who sees the various book piles I have amassed knows that gene is mightily expressed in me. My love of unreleased Beatles was something more difficult to explain.
By the time I was ten or so–that would’ve been 1979–I had determined I would become a writer. I wanted to be as popular as possible, so I turned to the Beatles for instruction. If you were training to be an artist, I thought, why not pick the most successful ones in history? So I didn’t just listen to a bootleg, I studied it, like a Rabbi-in-training studies the Talmud. I would compare the unused take to the final, trying to tweeze out all the decisions that had been made. What made this shabby-sounding track into a masterpiece? How did they do it?
Forty-five years later and a finished product–for better and worse–I still find myself doing this on the rare occasions that I listen to some unreleased Beatles on YouTube. How did the guys do it? How can I do it myself?
Of such things, editors are born.










At the beginning of my Beatlemania—in the mid-1980s—bootlegs were almost a Holy Grail. They were incredibly hard to find in my hometown, in Brazil, and even in larger cities they were extremely rare. Somehow, though, I managed to get hold of a few: The Decca Tapes, Who’s Shouting in My Ears, Beautiful Picture of You, and Johnny & The Moondogs.
Fast forward to 2026. I was in Barcelona and found an abundance of Beatles bootlegs in several record stores. Forty years ago, I would have been ecstatic. Today, they no longer interest me. I already know the tracks.
Time — and the internet — have done quite a number on that sense of discovery.
What really interests me is the music, so the digital files made available by Purple Chick are more than enough. But even those hold little appeal these days. Aside from previously unreleased songs, and with a few exceptions, each track is simply an inferior version of what the Beatles officially released. They no longer fascinate me the way they once did.
I feel the same way, @Rafael. There is no more mystery, no more thrill of the hunt.
Something I should’ve talked about in the initial post was the intimacy that a bootleg inspired. It’s probably the beginning of the impulse in me that eventually led to the creation of Dullblog. The internet simply doesn’t convey that; it is many things, but the web is the opposite of intimate.
‘It is many things, but the web is the opposite of intimate.’ This is one of the many things about modern life that makes me vaguely sad. I’ve spent a lot of time thinking about why it is that the fact that the Internet = the Library of Alexandria times a billion (and one you can contribute to yourself whenever you feel like it!) doesn’t make us all delirious with excitement every minute of every day. It seems to me that it’s a ‘medium is the message’ type of thing. It just doesn’t feel *appropriate* to be accessing Beethoven’s Ninth and Beowulf and The Seventh Seal and the Sistine Chapel ceiling through a tiny flat rectangle that also serves up social media slapfights, constant ads, endless parodies, hardcore porn, and whatever the latest TikTok trend is. It’s the very embodiment of postmodernism’s flattening of all history and culture, and the pastiche machine that is generative AI is hardly helping. That’s the devil’s bargain: you can have all the riches in the world delivered to your doorstep, but at the cost of reducing their richness. Anything that gets the Doordash treatment starts to seem a little like fast food.
“endless parodies”
[MG coughs.]
Haha!!
Next thing you know I’m gonna start knocking fan blogs XD
I must confess that I share Starostin’s opinion on Beatles demos, which is that they only go to show how good the band were at polishing things up before releasing the versions we all know and love. (Which is basically the same point you’re making, except that I don’t get the same kick out of hearing the process at work that you do. I wish I did.) Whereas with an anti-perfectionist like Dylan, who’ll record the same song in five different styles then release whichever one takes his fancy on the day, there really is a wealth of just-as-good-as-the-original-if-not-better demos out there (to say nothing of outtakes it’s just baffling he didn’t release at the time).
All that said, I’ve really been enjoying this today. Never heard ‘A Case of the Blues’ before! Love it! Can’t believe it isn’t better known! Why does it sound like a ’90s grunge song before its time! Wish John had developed it further with the others! But he was too busy convincing himself ‘Mary Jane’ had something to it… sigh…
https://youtu.be/Vrb3K4IRTE8?is=Rz7_srn1vTv0yq40
I’m about 15 years younger than you Mike. Got super into Beatles in college and became obsessed in a good way like most of us here. I remember when I discovered Anthology which for me was basically what bootlegs were to you I guess. I was consumed with Discs 2 and 3 and they eventually became some of my most played tracks. Particularly Bathroom Window, Rocky, Happiness, Junk, Cry Baby, Sadie (I love how deliberate and probably stoned John is on this track), and even Mailman is awesome! Wish it went on longer! Discovering these tunes was a totally unexpected gift. I still treasure them and favor them to the originals in some respects.
Forgot to mention some of my favorite 60 seconds of Beatle music: John (in the Dakota sometime in the late ‘70’s?) singing a very mellow version of Help! Apparently it was how he wrote it originally but bc they needed a single at the time (‘65?) it was sped up and made to zip along. How I wish there was a fleshed out slow version demo from when John originally created the song. It’s brilliant and reminds me (selfishly) of all the things we lost with his early passing. You just know he would’ve recorded more stuff like this as the years went by.