Recent Comments

  • User AvatarMichael Gerber If John and Paul had any kind of dalliance, it would've been impossible for them to keep it from their wives/girlfriends and the other two Beatles. I don't think it's impossible that they got close in India, but then one backed away for that (and a milliion other) reasons. But... – Apr 06, 3:47 PM
  • User AvatarMichael Gerber Yep, right. And because Paul was *even more threatening* than John in this regard -- the Paul of 1964 could practically model for statues of Antinous -- he came in for the most scorn. I happen to think that some of Rolling Stone's animus towards Paul in the 70s was... – Apr 06, 3:36 PM
  • User AvatarMichael Gerber Thanks, @Nancy. . Anybody who wants this thread to remain open, please write a brief comment as to why. I think we've discussed it long past any reasonable point, but if there are legitimate reasons for us to keep the thread open, I'm open to hearing them. I don't like... – Apr 06, 3:29 PM
  • User AvatarGretchen Nelson I wholeheartedly believe that they weren’t too. BUT..thst doesn’t mean that something might not have happened once(twice?) between Paul and John. That doesn’t mean they were gay. There’s just something about the way both of them acted after the breakup thst possibly signals something more than just being close friends.... – Apr 06, 1:43 PM
  • Nancy CarrNancy Carr Virginia, this is why I despair of this thread, at this point. . You write that "First, there is no “insistence”. But there is an insistence in denying. We only observe. And see because it is so clear." . You ARE insisting. And you keep saying that anyone who doesn't... – Apr 06, 11:44 AM
  • »»