Beatles For Sale sessions

Ya follow?

Michael Gerber

Publisher at The American Bystander
is Blogmom of Hey Dullblog. His novels and parodies have sold 1.25 million copies in 25 languages. He lives in Santa Monica, CA, and runs The American Bystander all-star print humor magazine.
Michael Gerber
Ya follow?

Latest posts by Michael Gerber (see all)

Beatles 1964 collage filtered

Four little-known musicians from Liverpool, 1964

MIKE GERBER • We’ve linked to the devilishly delightful site Willard’s Wormholes before, and in the process of fixing that link this morning, I found a wonderful something I just had to pass along.

My love for 1964’s Oh-Shit-Christmas-Is-Coming LP Beatles For Sale is almost as idiosyncratic as my affection for psychedelia.* Truth be told, I think my love began when I heard Malcolm McDowell’s almost ominous descriptions of the period in “The Compleat Beatles”. (“Haggard”…”windswept”…am I making this up? I distinctly remember it.) It’s the backside of Beatlemania that I’m always more interested in.

Anyway, this post allows you to listen to the Fabs constructing “I’m a Loser” from that lovely, though admittedly minor, album. Enjoy.

 

*I think this is getting out of hand. I spent most of an hour this morning listening happily to The Stones’ instrumental tracks for Satanic Majesties.

That is something I’d never thought I’d type.

Donations to the Save Mike from Mellotrons Fund can be sent through PayPal.

If you liked this, share it!
Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on StumbleUpon
StumbleUpon


10 Comments

  1. Avatar linda a wrote:

    Beatles for Sale was always one of my favorite albums. Even now I find myself picking it to listen to over even Abbey Road and Revolver. I cherish these I’m a Loser out takes. They are all also among my favorites to listen to.

  2. Avatar Velvet Hand wrote:

    You Are Not Alone. The SMR instrumentals are addictive for 2 unbeatable reasons:
    1) They expand on & elucidate what will (surely?) one day be viewed as the Stones’ most awesome period. Oh yes. I’m sorry but “We Love You” is a MUCH better record than “All You Need Is Love”. Sorry again. It’s because of J&P of course (obviously).
    2) I can play the Stones at home because there’s no Jagger (whose voice is not well-tolerated by mah husband) in there.

    Um, I don’t have any strong opinions on Beatles For Sale unfortunately, other than “I really like the fact that it’s comparatively mellow, especially side 2 (which nobody ever seems to mention as all everyone EVER goes on about in connection with BFS is how terrible “Mr Moonlight” is, which is of course a lie).

  3. Nancy Carr Nancy Carr wrote:

    I too love “Beatles For Sale.” I adore “I’ll Follow the Sun,” which has lovely Lennon/McCartney harmonies, and the cover of “Words of Love,” which has similarly great Lennon/Harrison harmonies. In general the vocals on this album seem especially cooperative to me. And “Kansas City / Hey Hey Hey” is a lot of fun—everyone sounds like they’re having a great time doing it.

    I even have a sneaking fondness for “Mr. Moonlight.” How can you hate a song that starts with that Lennon exclamation and includes a skating-rink organ break? (Clearly, the Mellotrons have already come for me.)

    • Nancy, there is nothing remotely sneaking about my fondness for “Mr Moonlight.” It is (predictably) loud and proud.

      If a person cannot hear the awesomeness of a Hammond organ in full groan, there is nothing to be done for them. (My mother is one of this sad group, btw.) But I think the real reason I love “Mr Moonlight” is how, well, awkward it is. It is the clumsiest Beatles song I can think of, and this makes it to me as adorable and winning as a 13-year-old whose eyes haven’t caught up with his/her nose.

  4. Avatar Beasty Glanglemutton wrote:

    Once you get past the shameless copying of ‘Pepper’, ‘Majesties’ is not a half-bad album. Citadel and 2000 Man could fit on any Stones album of that era, and She’s A Rainbow is good psychedelia. Overall, not a bad effort considering they were in and out of court and jail throughout its making.

    • Avatar Velvet Hand wrote:

      Quite! And “The Lantern” – why isn’t this on every Stones compilation instead of, pfff, “Out of Time” or something?

      May I direct the assembled connoisseurs towards a nifty summary of that period? More shameless “Pepper” copying ahoy! Includes “Anyone For Tennis”!
      http://thesoundthepastmakes.blogspot.de/2010/12/cosmic-christmas.html

      Since this was more of a BFS post, however, I would also like to add that there are not only no bad songs on that record (only the Ringo and George covers are a bit “huh?”), there is also stuff that puts most of the preceding and subsequent alsbums to shame. I don’t even know what to say about “No Reply”. And the cover! Why didn’t they do those gatefold things more often? Imagine a gatefold “Rubber Soul” with even more pics of John peering out from a hedge and even more moody smoking!

      • Avatar Velvet Hand wrote:

        Um, I guess that should have read “puts most of the songs on the immediately preceding and subsequent albums to shame”. I do not believe that BFS is a better record than Revolver.

  5. Chris Dingman Chris Dingman wrote:

    Does anyone know if the whole CD of the outtakes for Beatles for Sale (which include the I’m a Loser versions) can be obtained/bought anywhere?

%d bloggers like this: